Cases 71 - 80 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nooks v. Holder, Jr.
as 14-1916
Petitioner:
MELVIN CLIFFORD NOOKS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
CLIFFORD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2014cv00275
Plaintiff:
PETER R CLIFFORD
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Mossey v. Ruehrwein et al
as 1:2014cv00106
Defendant:
Clifford W. Perham, Inc. and Kevin R. Ruehrwein
Plaintiff:
Derek Mossey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
HETHCOAT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2013cv00470
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD HETHCOAT
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CLIFFORD v. KEMMERER
as 1:2013cv00467
Plaintiff:
LINDA J CLIFFORD
Defendant:
SCOTT KEMMERER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Rodd
as 1:2013cv00424
Plaintiff:
Clifford E. Avery
Defendant:
Carey Rodd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bankert v. North Attleborough Conservation Commission et al
as 1:2013cv11859
Defendant:
North Attleborough Conservation Commission , Clifford Bassett , Shannon Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Bankert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Singleton v. Zimmer Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11411
Plaintiff:
Clifford Singleton
Defendant:
Zimmer Holdings Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
