Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 596
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mejia et al v. NH Department of Education, Commissioner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01077
Plaintiff: Andres Mejia, Christina Kim Philibotte and National Education Association-New Hampshire
Defendant: NH Department of Education, Commissioner, NH Attorney General, NH Commission for Human Rights, Executive Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Local 8027, AFT-New Hampshire, AFL-CIO et al v. NH Department of Education, Commissioner et al
as 1:2021cv01063
Plaintiff: Local 8027, AFT-New Hampshire, AFL-CIO, Ryan Richman, John Dube and others
Defendant: NH Department of Education, Commissioner, NH Commission on Human Rights, Chair and NH Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howell v. Department of Housing and Community Development et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv11978
Plaintiff: Curtis Howell
Defendant: Department of Housing and Community Development, Community Teamwork, Inc., New Hampshire Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doe v. Lisbon, NH, Town of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00944
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Lisbon, NH, Town of and New Hampshire Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woodham v. Kopp, et al
as 21-1889
Plaintiff / Appellant: GRACE WOODHAM
Defendant / Appellee: SHARON A. KOPP, NHSP Retired Trooper First Class, both in her individual and official capacity, MATTHEW C. PARTINGTON, NHSP Trooper First Class, both in his individual and official capacity, ADAM J. FANJOY, NHFMO District Chief, both in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: NH DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, State Police, Bomb Squad, Forensic Lab, FNU FLYNN, NH State Police Bomb Squad, both in his individual and official capacity, FNU CYR, NH State Police Bomb Squad, both in his individual and official capacity and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating for Campus Equality
as 21-1784
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00845
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Doe, et al
as 21-1783
Plaintiff: CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: STATE OF TEXAS, LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Cardona, et al
as 21-1782
Plaintiff / Appellant: VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, ANNE DOE, EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party: LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?