Cases 81 - 90 of 92
Amador v. Sears Roebuck of Puerto Rico, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01581
Plaintiff:
Antonio E Amador
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck of Puerto Rico, Inc., Companies A ,B & C, Insurance Companies X, Y & Z and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv11758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Quevedo-Gaitan v. Sears Roebuck de Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01371
Plaintiff:
Bertha Ines Quevedo-Gaitan
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck de Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bishara v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
as 1:2007cv10781
Plaintiff:
Mary Bishara
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Sears, Roebuck & Co., Icon Health and Fitness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00080
Plaintiff:
State of New Hampshire
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Corporation, Cumberland Farms, Inc., FirstGroup America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land (CERCLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
