Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Kersey v. Avery Dennison Pension Plan
as 1:2024cv11250
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
Avery Dennison Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2023cv13137
Plaintiff:
Avery L. Davis
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pollock v. Berkshire County Jail and House of Correction et al
as 3:2023cv30131
Plaintiff:
Avery Jacob Pollock
Defendant:
Berkshire County Jail and House of Correction and Goodwordnews.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. State of NH
as 23-1641
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR CLIFFORD AVERY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Kersey v. Avery Dennison Corporation
as 23-1614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE E. KERSEY
Defendant / Appellee:
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
Kersey v. Avery Dennison Corporation
as 1:2023cv11576
Plaintiff:
George E Kersey
Defendant:
Avery Dennison Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Avery v. NH Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023fp00287
Plaintiff:
Edgar Clifford Avery, Jr.
Defendant:
NH Supreme Court, J. Donovan, NH Supreme Court, Chief Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
HAILE AVERY GRANT
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Avery v. NH, State of
as 1:2023cv00245
Petitioner:
Edgar Clifford Avery, Jr.
Respondent:
NH, State of
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
