Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Hanna v. Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 1:2023cv12340
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Hanna
Defendant:
Department of Children and Family Services, Coneicao Pereira, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fiorillo v. Sheehan et al
as 1:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Fiorillo
Defendant:
Brian Sheehan, Lisa Serfin, John Desmond and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burke et al v. Walsh et al
as 1:2023cv11798
Plaintiff:
Michael Burke and Catherine Burke
Defendant:
Secretary Kate Walsh, Commisioner Linda Spears, Area Director Laurie Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burke et al v. Walsh et al
as 3:2023cv11798
Plaintiff:
Michael Burke and Catherine Burke
Defendant:
Secretary Kate Walsh, Commisioner Linda Spears, Area Director Laurie Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Economou et al v. Boyd et al
as 3:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
George Economou, Lidiana Rodriguez, Conjugal Partnership Economou Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Gregory Boyd, Julia Hathaway Boyd, Conjugal Partnership Hathaway-Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FRANCK v. LEWISTON VA CLINIC et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANCK
Defendant:
LEWISTON VA CLINIC, DOREEN HUNT, EDWARD STEELE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
