Cases 1 - 10 of 16
GARLAND v. NEWMAN ET AL
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH WAYNE GARLAND
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTINA NEWMAN, SCOTT KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NISBET v. ELLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA R NISBET and JOSHUA LIBBY
Defendant:
ROB ELLIS, STEVE WEBSTER, CHRIS TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSSON et al v. OWNER OF PROPERTY TIM et al
as 2:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
OWNER OF PROPERTY TIM and 76 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERBERT v. DIKINS et al
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA HERBERT
Defendant:
TERRY DIKINS, JANICE YOUNG, TIM MAYHEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERBERT v. MEGHAR et al
as 1:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA E HERBERT
Defendant:
DR ANDREW MEGHAR, SAM CORDEIRO, JANET CORDEIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANSON v. PHYSICIAN HEALTH PARTNERS LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00393
Defendant:
KIM VIGUE, PHYSICIAN HEALTH PARTNERS LLC, TIM CANHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD HANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAQUETTE v. CPC RULE PROGRAM ADMIN et al
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
PENNY BAILEY, TIM APP, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ADMIN and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID FONTES PAQUETTE, SR
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCK v. CITY OF GARDINER POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A TUCK
Defendant:
CITY OF GARDINER POLICE DEPARTMENT, TODD PILLSBURY, STACY BLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
PRICE v. BELLARCEAU et al
as 2:2012cv00308
Defendant:
TIM BELLARCEAU, SUGARFOOT I S/V and SUGARFOOT II S/V
Plaintiff:
EARL PRICE, III
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
