Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Landry v. Rhode Island State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Ana Cristina Cola, Rhode Island State Police, Lt. R. Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Norman J. Landry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv30110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Towne v. Gardner et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Brenda Towne
Defendant:
William Gardner, David Scanlan, Harri Hursti and others
Clervrain v. Healey et al
as 1:2022cv10545
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Healey, Bill Galvin, Ed Markey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Kimball v. Hebert
as 1:2021cv00877
Plaintiff:
Donald H. Kimball
Defendant:
Steven Hebert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Wells v. Hebert
as 1:2021cv00643
Plaintiff:
Marcy M. Wells
Defendant:
Lillian Hebert and Lillian Zimmermann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hebert v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shelly Hebert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Rumford Free Cath. Library, et al v. Town of Rumford, et al
as 20-1816
Defendant / Appellee:
HEBERT REALTY CO., LOUISE NASH, LINNELL GERONDA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP M. STARK, RUMFORD FREE CATHOLIC LIBRARY and PETER TINKHAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
