Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hadley v. Capone et al
as 1:2024cv10520
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hadley, Devol Pond Association, The 2021 Hadley Family Real Estate Trust and others
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zarba, et al v. Town of Oak Bluffs, et al
as 20-1845
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREA ROGERS, member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oak Bluffs, RONALD H. RAPPAPORT, Town Counsel of the Town of Oak Bluffs, REYNOLDS, RAPPAPORT, KAPLAN & HACKNEY, LLC, town counsel law firm to the Town of Oak Bluffs and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH RE, member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oak Bluffs and GEORGE WARREN, member of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oak Bluffs
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN LEMOIE ZARBA, JOHN ZARBA and SUSAN LEMOIE-ZARBA
Zarba et al v. The Town of Oak Bluffs et al
as 1:2019cv11368
Defendant:
George Warren, Ronald Rappaport, Kris Chvatal and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Lemoie Zarba and John Zarba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. MacKenzie, Jr.
as 15-1339
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWARD J. MACKENZIE, JR.
Interested Party:
PETER O'CONNELL, MICHAEL PERRY and BOSTON SOCIETY OF THE NEW JERUSALEM INC
US v. MacKenzie, Jr.
as 15-1363
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWARD J. MACKENZIE, JR.
Interested Party:
PETER O'CONNELL, MICHAEL PERRY and BOSTON SOCIETY OF THE NEW JERUSALEM INC
Nicasio et al v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2012cv40079
Plaintiff:
Junior D Nicasio
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Michael V. O'Brien, Gary J. Gemme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry, et al v. American First Federal, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11054
Defendant:
American First Federal, Inc., American First Federal, Inc., Beacon Holding, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry, Beacon Holdings, Inc. and Pacific Mills Aquisition, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
