Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Silva Braganca Lemos, et al v. Garland
as 24-1440
Petitioner:
IAGO SILVA BRAGANCA LEMOS, ISABELA RODRIGUES LEMOS BRAGANCA, I. B. L. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Theroux v. Segars et al
as 1:2023cv00337
Defendant:
Quality Containers of New England, Inc., Aaron B Segars, Neal Grenier doing business as Neal Grenier Trucking and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Theroux
Cross Defendant:
Neal Grenier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Manuel v. City of Bangor, et al
as 11-2470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATHEA ELIZABETH BELL MANUEL
Plaintiff:
PETER BANKS MANUEL, MAVERICK BANKS BROWN MANUEL and GARY MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE, BANGOR MEN SHELTER, BANGOR PARK WOODS and others
Interested Party:
ME ATTORNEY GENERAL
MANUEL et al v. CITY OF BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE et al
as 1:2011cv00357
Plaintiff:
ATHEA ELIZABETH BELL MANUEL, GARY EMANUEL MANUEL, PETER BANKS MANUEL and others
Defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE, CITY OF BANGOR PARK WOODS, CITY OF BANGOR MEN SHELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Manuel v. City of Bangor, et al
as 10-2015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY MANUEL
Plaintiff:
EUNICE MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BANGOR, ME, BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE, PARK WOODS and others
Defendant:
US ARMY, Bangor Recruiting Station, BANK OF AMERICA and GILBERT AND GRIEF LAW FIRM
Manuel v. City of Bangor, et al
as 10-1821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY MANUEL
Plaintiff:
EUNICE MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BANGOR, ME, BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE, PARK WOODS and others
Defendant:
PENQUIS COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTER, B & L PROPERTIES and others
MANUEL et al v. BANGOR, CITY OF et al
as 1:2009cv00339
Plaintiff:
GARY MANUEL
Defendant:
PENQUIS COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTER and B&L PROPERTIES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
