Cases 1 - 10 of 1,600
Berdecia et al v. Matos-Negron et al
as 3:2024cv01264
Plaintiff:
Nelson R Berdecia, Annia Berdecia and Ricardo Berdecia
Defendant:
Dr. Jose A Matos-Negron, Dr. Carlos E Marrero-Ortiz, Dr. Arlene Hernandez-Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Romine et al v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv11511
Defendant:
FullscopeRMS, Progress Software Corporation, Aetna Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Romine, Paul Baade, Gary Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Hernandez-Rodriguez
as 24-1534
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
DINELSON HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1482
Plaintiff:
CASANDRA HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Hernandez-Graulau et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Nelson Hernandez-Graulau and Ana M Graulau-Collazo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Alvarado-Hernandez, et al v. Garland
as 24-1447
Petitioner:
MAIDELIN NOEMI ALVARADO-HERNANDEZ, JOSE ZALDIVAR-VASQUEZ and H.C.S.A.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Morales-Hernandez
as 24-1398
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANGEL L. MORALES-HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Angel, a/k/a Chinese Checker
Johnson v. Ocasio-Montanez, et al
as 24-1423
Petitioner:
OBE E. JOHNSON
Respondent:
LUIS OCASIO-MONTANEZ and DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ
Hernandez v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30054
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Steven Tatro, Anthony Pioggia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz-Montero v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1345
Plaintiff:
NESTOR A. ORTIZ-MONTERO
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Justice, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
