Cases 1 - 10 of 17
LAZ KARP Associates, LLC v. Dean Auto Collision Center, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
LAZ KARP Associates, LLC
Defendant:
Dean Auto Collision Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Gomes et al v. State Street Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10863
Plaintiff:
Kenneth N. Marenga, Eva M. Connors, Steven Peters and others
Defendant:
North America Regional Benefits Committee of State Street Corporation, State Street Corporation, Jane and John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Karp v. Voyager Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10727
Defendant:
Voyager Therapeutics, Inc., Jane Henderson, Allison Dorval and others
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Karp
Petitioner:
Victor Otcheretko and Oleg Khokhlov
Spencer v. O'Brien, et al
as 17-1327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY H. SPENCER, II
Defendant:
PSY.D HELEN PRESSKREISCHER, COMMONWEALTH, DET. CORDONA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN O'BRIEN, SGT. FORRESTOR, OFFICER LAWIAN and others
Karp et al v. Juarbe-Torres et al
as 3:2016cv01489
Plaintiff:
Susan Ann Karp , Timothy Karph and Conjugal Partnership Karp
Defendant:
Norma Juarbe-Torres, John Doe, Conjugal Partnership Doe-Juarbe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Spencer v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2015cv10518
Plaintiff:
Barry Spencer
Defendant:
Jonathan O'Brien, Commonwealth, Cordona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendelson v. Karp
as 1:2013cv11940
Plaintiff:
Ruth Mendelson
Defendant:
Douglas Karp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Karp v. The Gap, Inc.
as 4:2013cv11600
Plaintiff:
Molly Karp
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Karp v. The Gap, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11600
Plaintiff:
Molly Karp
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Karp v. The Gap, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11600
Plaintiff:
Molly Karp
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
