Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Burgess v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11805
Plaintiff:
Charles F.O. Burgess
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hootstein v. Town of Shutesbury et al
as 3:2023cv30057
Plaintiff:
Michael Hootstein and Pro se litigant Michael Hootstein
Defendant:
Town of Shutesbury, Kristin Burgess and Mary Anne Antonellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. USA
as 1:2022cv12005
Petitioner:
Arthur Burgess
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BURGESS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
MARSHA LEE BURGESS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Neeff v. Trustees of Boston University et al
as 1:2022cv11302
Plaintiff:
Jerrold G. Neeff
Defendant:
Trustees of Boston University, Juditra Burgess and Chaoyi Hou
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Douglas, et al v. Hirshon, et al
as 22-1483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN FOWLER, JOEL DOUGLAS and JAMES LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID HIRSHON and LOSU LLC
Defendant:
BIRCH POINT STORAGE LLC, MICHAEL LYDEN, SHAWN LYDEN and others
Interested Party:
WHIPPING POST LLC and MARC FISHMAN
DOUGLAS et al v. LALUMIERE et al
as 2:2020cv00227
Defendant:
DAVID CLARKE, ANDRE BELLUCCI, BLR CAPITAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL DOUGLAS, JAMES LEWIS and STEVEN FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Burgess et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00679
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Edna Burgess, Jarrell Burgess and Jarrell Layfayette Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
