Cases 1 - 10 of 10
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC v. CRAM
as 1:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Defendant:
MICAH R CRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
REVERSE MORTGAGE FUNDING LLC v. PRANES
as 2:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
REVERSE MORTGAGE FUNDING LLC
Defendant:
JAMES H PRANES
Interested Party:
SECRETARY OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, CHRISTINE BOWDEN, JACQUELINE BOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNNIGAN v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv00450
Defendant:
DONOVAN CRAM, YORK COUNTY, WILLIAM KING and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DUNNIGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cram et al v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00394
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation, Shoukat Dhanani, Houston Foods, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cram and John Cram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BEAL et al v. MVM INC
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JAMES BEAL , MELANIE WALKER , DANIEL B MYSHRALL and others
Defendant:
MVM INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Brown, III
as 11-1629
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT BROWN, III
Interested Party:
ALLEN EMERY BRADEEN, JR. and JUSTIN CRAM
US v. Brown
as 09-2146
Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
ROBERT BROWN, III
Interested Party:
ALLEN EMERY BRADEEN, JR. and JUSTIN CRAM
US v. Brown
as 09-2084
Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
ROBERT BROWN, III
Interested Party:
ALLEN EMERY BRADEEN, JR. and JUSTIN CRAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
