Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
US v. Cruz-Rodriguez
as 15-2338
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS D. CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Carlitos Way, a/k/a Carlos Cuajo
Abreu-Morales et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv02067
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Abreu-Morales, Jose M. Arroyo-Morales, Alex Omar-Bernardi and others
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , Doral Financial Corporation, Doral Mortgage LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cruz-Barrios v. Cooperativa de Farmacia Santa Teresita
as 3:2013cv01306
Plaintiff:
Lucy D Cruz-Barrios
Defendant:
Cooperativa de Farmacia Santa Teresita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cruz-Rodriguez v. US
as 11-1976
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS D. CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Carlos Cuajo, a/k/a Carlitos Way
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
EDGAR R. VEGA PABON
Cruz-Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2010cv01455
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos D. Cruz-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Serrano Mojica et al v. El Conquistador Resort and Golden Door Spa
as 3:2008cv01797
Plaintiff:
Ruben Serrano Mojica, Carmen D. Cruz Martinez and Conjugal Partnership Serrano-Cruz
Defendant:
El Conquistador Resort and Golden Door Spa
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Cruz-Reyes
as 3:2007cv02115
Plaintiff:
HICA Education Loan Corporation
Defendant:
Carmen D. Cruz-Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. Cruz-Rodriguez
as 05-2492
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS D. CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Carlos Cuajo, a/k/a Carlitos Way
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
