Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Preciado v. Massachusetts Department of Revenue Child Support Division et al
as 1:2020cv11738
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Motor Vehicles and Massachusetts Department of Revenue Child Support Division
Plaintiff:
Ernest Preciado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perales v. US House of Representatives, Standing Committee on Appropriations et al
as 1:2012fp00140
Defendant:
All Related Defendants, CA Attorney General Office, Department of Justice Public Inquiry, CA Department of Motor Vehicles and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Manuel v. City of Bangor, et al
as 11-2470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATHEA ELIZABETH BELL MANUEL
Plaintiff:
PETER BANKS MANUEL, MAVERICK BANKS BROWN MANUEL and GARY MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE, BANGOR MEN SHELTER, BANGOR PARK WOODS and others
Interested Party:
ME ATTORNEY GENERAL
Manuel v. City of Bangor, et al
as 10-2015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY MANUEL
Plaintiff:
EUNICE MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BANGOR, ME, BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE, PARK WOODS and others
Defendant:
US ARMY, Bangor Recruiting Station, BANK OF AMERICA and GILBERT AND GRIEF LAW FIRM
Manuel v. City of Bangor, et al
as 10-1821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY MANUEL
Plaintiff:
EUNICE MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BANGOR, ME, BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE, PARK WOODS and others
Defendant:
PENQUIS COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTER, B & L PROPERTIES and others
Pelumi v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 09-2122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAKEEM B. PELUMI
Defendant - Appellee:
MONIQUE LANDRY, GORDON HEPWORTH, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND and others
Pelumi v. Gerstmeyer et al
as 1:2009cv00258
Plaintiff:
Hakeem B. Pelumi
Defendant:
Dennis G. Gerstmeyer, State of Rhode Island, City of Woonsocket and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
