Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Barrett v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
as 1:2020cv12118
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Barrett
Defendant:
USAA Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barrett v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00482
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ortiz-Marrero et al v. Marina Las Gaviotas Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv02381
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Ortiz-Marrero , Nestor R Rodriguez-Aponte , Margie Rola-Zabala and others
Defendant:
Marina Las Gaviotas Corporation, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico , Popular Mortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Barrett v. AeroSat Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00366
Defendant:
AeroSat Corporation, Sherwood Goldberg and David H. Rowe
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Doctor's Data, Inc. v. Barratt et al
as 1:2012mc91285
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Data, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen J. Barrett, The National Council Against Health Fraud, Inc. and Quackwatch, Inc.
Movant:
Robert S. Baratz
Barrett v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03426
Plaintiff:
Brenda J Barrett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc. , Joseph Vitello, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Araujo, et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 08-2417
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence and URBANO PRIGNANO, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Chief of Police for the City of Providence
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its treasurer, Steven T. Napolitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Walden, et al v. Lennon, et al
as 08-1536
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, Steven T. Naplitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Walden, et al v. Providence, RI by and through, et al
as 08-1535
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
