Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hassell v. Kimbark, et al
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW-LANE HASSELL
Defendant:
DEVIN AILEEN KIMBARK, CHERYL L. KIMBARK, MARK KIMBARK and others
Dieter v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2023cv12086
Plaintiff:
Linda Dieter
Defendant:
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Michael Ponsor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MACDONALD v. DUDDY et al
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL DUDDY, JUDGE LOU ANN SUTTON, JUDGE MULHERN and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clapp v. Tobin, et al
as 22-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN S. CLAPP
Defendant:
CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Governor of Massachusetts, MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, Norfolk County District Attorney, RICHARD D. MCKEON, Massachusetts State Police (Retired) and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER BRUCE TOBIN, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, TROOPER SCOTT KEARNS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, SGT. BRIAN BROOKS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office and others
Kayuh One, LLC et al v. Amor Architectural Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10489
Plaintiff:
Kayuh One, LLC, Gek Yee O'Malley and Kayuh One, LLC doing business as Row House Lovejoy Wharf
Defendant:
William Amor and Amor Architectural Corp.
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Michael Ponsor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
SOUCIE v. DUBOIS et al
as 2:2014cv00006
Defendant:
DEBORAH DUBOIS, JUDGE MICHAEL CONTERA and MICHAEL ALFANO
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Plaintiff:
RONALD J SOUCIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
