Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thompson v. Fidelity Investments
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Minister Deric M. Thompson
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Thompson v. Carney et al
as 1:2024cv11184
Plaintiff:
Deric M Thompson
Defendant:
James P. Carney and Bernardi Auto Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Houghton v. Sticky Molasses, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10926
Plaintiff:
David Houghton
Defendant:
Sticky Molasses, LLC doing business as Blackstrap Barbecue, Christopher M Thompson and Kate L Economides
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Page Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thompson v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2011cv10475
Defendant:
Merita A. Hopkins , Frances A. McIntyre , Mitchell H. Kaplan and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA, Ex Rel et al v. USA et al
as 1:2010cv00321
Defendant:
Ryan Barry, Stanley F. Birch, Jr., Susan H. Black and others
Plaintiff:
Jorg Busse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott and USA, Ex Rel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jenks et al v. New Hampshire Motor Speedway, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00205
Plaintiff:
Melissa Jenks and Melissa Jenks
Defendant:
New Hampshire Motor Speedway, Inc., Breann M. Thompson, Checkered Flag Snack Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thompson v. USA
as 1:2009cv00184
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory M Thompson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv12105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thompson v. Methuen, City of et al
as 1:2007cv12196
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Thompson
Defendant:
Methuen, City of, Jeanne C. Whitten, Charles P. Littlefield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
