Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., et al v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Defendant:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Interested Party:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, SARAH COLE, NEW ENGLAND FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
In Re:Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1088
Petitioner:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Respondent:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Interested Party:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, and 36 other Higher Education Organizations, MICHAEL P. KEANE and others
Jones v. Hillman, et al
as 22-1256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, SIDNEY HANLON, SIDNEY KEATON-WALKER and others
Jones v. Hillman et al
as 1:2021cv11704
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Judge Timothy S. Hillman, Judge Sidney Hanlon and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martins et al v Jose M.B. Martins, et al.
as 1:2017cv10956
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle B Martins and Jose Antonio Barros Martins
Defendant:
Jose M.B. Martins, Gabriel Martins, ExxonMobil Savings Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Dot Ave Cab, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2017cv10180
Plaintiff:
Dot Ave Cab, Inc. , A.J.I. Taxi, Inc. , Albee Cab, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
US v. Georgiadi
as 15-2194
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
Q EVRIPIDES GEORGIADIS, a/k/a Dr. Eric, a/k/a Eric Georgiadis
Interested Party:
GOOGLE, INC., KENNETH DAVLIN, AMERICAN ETHANOL CALIFORNIA, INC. and others
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows, et al
as 15-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Movant - Appellant:
SARAH COLE, FADHAL MOORE, ARJINI KUMARI NAWAL and others
Araujo, et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 08-2417
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence and URBANO PRIGNANO, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Chief of Police for the City of Providence
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its treasurer, Steven T. Napolitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Walden, et al v. Lennon, et al
as 08-1536
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, Steven T. Naplitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
