Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hall v. Dauphinee
as 1:2021cv11175
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
Lorraine E. Dauphinee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall v. Capeless, et al
as 20-1394
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID F. CAPELESS, in his official capacity, and his personal capacity, MARY COUGHLIN, ROSE DAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
EME, through Adam Lee Michael Hall, Guardian AD-Litem and father of EME, a minor and a victim of defendants
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM HALL
Hall v. Local 387, American Postal Workers Union, Inc.,
as 1:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
Local 387, American Postal Workers Union, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Piro et al v. Exergen Corporation
as 1:2015cv11834
Plaintiff:
Julie Piro and Michael Hall
Defendant:
Exergen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv30110
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Hall
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hall et al v. New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2013cv10437
Plaintiff:
Rhonda L. Hall and Michael Hall
Defendant:
New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hall v. Springfield, City of et al
as 3:2013cv30002
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
Springfield, City of, Springfield Police Department and Detective Wadlegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Champion Exposition Services LLC v. Nexxt Show, LLC
as 1:2010cv12228
Plaintiff:
Champion Exposition Services LLC , WCP Exposition Services Operating Company LLC and WCP Exposition Services Holding Company LLC
Defendant:
Nexxt Show, LLC , Mark Epstein , Matthew Epstein and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Hall v. Salem, Town of et al
as 1:2007cv00330
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
Salem, Town of, Salem, NH, Police Chief, Charles Flahive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
