Cases 1 - 10 of 281
Varga v. White et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gerard Varga
Defendant:
Mike White, Illumination Animation and Chris Meledandri
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Boggs v. 34 Bowdoin et al
as 1:2024cv10986
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
34 Bowdoin and Alisa, Mike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shahbazian et al v. Progress Software Corporation
as 1:2023cv12903
Plaintiff:
Arayik Shahbazian and Mike Spanos
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rodrigues et al v. City of Brockton et al
as 1:2023cv12724
Plaintiff:
Djason Rodrigues, Danielson Rodrigues and Jason Mosley
Defendant:
City of Brockton, City of Brockton Police Department, Mayor Robert F. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv12303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
FARRINGTON v. FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FARRINGTON
Defendant:
FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS GOULD, DAKOTA WILLHOITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Pierre-Mike, et al
as 23-1774
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALBERT GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
JANAYA PIERRE-MIKE and RICARDO R. CARTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
