Cases 1 - 10 of 1,141
Acosta v. Providence Police Department
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Robert Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Providence Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Opalenik v. City of Northampton et al
as 3:2024cv30068
Plaintiff:
Stephen Opalenik, Jr
Defendant:
City of Northampton, Northampton Police Department, Gina-Louise Sciarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brum v. Town of Bristol et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Brum
Defendant:
Town of Bristol, Bristol Police Department, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, et al
as 24-1368
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Howell v. Pine Street Inn, et al
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
PINE STREET INN, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Howell v. Watertown Public Library, et al
as 24-1370
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
WATERTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY and WATERTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Strong v. Boston Police Department A-7
as 1:2024cv11031
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
Boston Police Department A-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez v. Lexington Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv10908
Plaintiff:
Tania Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lexington Police Department, Christopher Barry, Michael Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
LaFlamme v. Town of North Kingstown et al
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Alan LaFlamme
Defendant:
Town of North Kingstown, Debra Bridgham, Patrick Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
dais deapocalypse bey v. Clapprood, et al
as 24-1312
Plaintiff:
RA DAIS DEAPOCALYPSE BEY
Defendant:
CHERYL CLAPPROOD, Superintendent, Springfield Police Department and CRAIG MOREL, President, CJ Towing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
