Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stormo v. State National Insurance Company
as 23-1792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOAN STORMO, as assignee of Peter Clark and JOAN STORMO, as assignee of Peter T. Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Interested Party:
MORRISON MAHONEY LLP
Clark v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2020cv10154
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Clark
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation
as 1:2016cv11822
Plaintiff:
Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation
Defendant:
Law Offices of Peter T. Clark, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Jan Five Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv12906
Plaintiff:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jan Five Corporation, G. T. Clark Business Trust, Alexandra Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
William T. Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sabitoni v. T. Clarke Construction Co., Inc.
as 1:2009cv00315
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Sabitoni and Rhode Island Laborers' District Council of the Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
T. Clarke Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Anderson, et al v. Watertown Savings Bank, et al
as 08-1767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZRA D. ANDERSON and AUDREY E. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WATERTOWN SAVINGS BANK, BRADLEY T. CLARK, President and LEO M. ARCHER, Trustee
Anderson et al. v. Watertown Savings Bank et al.
as 1:2007cv11180
Plaintiff:
Ezra D. Anderson, Jr. and Audrey E. Anderson
Defendant:
Watertown Savings Bank, Bradley T. Clark and Leo M. Archer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
