Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tibbs v. Gender Dysphoria Group et al
as 1:2022cv11849
Plaintiff:
Jerome Tibbs and Nina Harmony Tibbs
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Gender Dysphoria Group, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tibbs v. Silva
as 1:2019cv12023
Petitioner:
Jerome Tibbs
Respondent:
Steve Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Gero, et al
as 14-1755
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY M. BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER GERO and CORRECTION OFFICER OPONASET
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD
Tibbs v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv11095
Plaintiff:
Jerome Tibbs
Defendant:
Rebekah E. Samuels, Robert E. Stork, William H. Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2310
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Movant - Interested Party:
MA PAROLE BOARD
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2139
Plaintiff:
DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant:
RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Allen, et al v. Rouse, et al
as 1:2000cv10981
Plaintiff:
Michael Braxton , Darryl Buchanan , Willard Clark and others
Defendant:
Richard J. Rouse , Suffolk County Sheriff's Department , Richard Feeney and others
Counter_claimant:
Richard J. Rouse , Suffolk County Sheriff's Department , Richard Feeney and others
Counter_defendant:
Darrel Allen , Kevin Bacchus , Anthony Bova and others
Movant:
Massachusetts Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
