Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Block v. Boncher, et al
as 24-1530
Plaintiff:
WAYLEN BLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN AMY BONCHER, in her official and individual capacity as Warden for FMC Devens, SINCADA, in his official capacity as acting Case Manager for petitioner at FMC Devens, HANSEN, as acting Councilor for petitioner at FMC evens in official capacity and others
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1959
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Respondent:
ANTHONY J. HARDY, ZACHARY SWAIN, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1639
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and JACOB ZERNICKI
Respondent:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY J. HARDY, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Stow v. McGrath, et al
as 21-1400
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN PERKINS, ROBERT MCGRATH, Prison Unit Manager, NH State Prison, RICHARD HARDY, Sergeant, NH State Prison and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER H. KENCH, Director of Security and Training, NH Department of Corrections, LYNMARIE C. CUSACK, Assistant Attorney General and HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTON J. STOW
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Stow v. McGrath, et al
as 20-1109
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD HARDY, Sergeant, NH State Prison, JOHN PERKINS, ROBERT MCGRATH, Prison Unit Manager, NH State Prison and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM L. WRENN, Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections, CHRISTOPHER H. KENCH, Director of Security and Training, NH Department of Corrections and LYNMARIE C. CUSACK, Assistant Attorney General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTON J. STOW
Gladu v. Maine Department of Correction, et al
as 19-2050
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TROY ROSS, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Warden and GLADYS CASSESE, individually and in her official capacity as Unit Manager
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv30170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
