Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Wong, et al v. FMR LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON BAILIS, MYRL JEFFCOAT, KAREN PETTUS and others
Defendant / Appellee: FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY, FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST CO., FMR LLC and others
Plaintiff: CATEENIA D. JOHNSON, on behalf of the T-Mobile USA, Inc. 401 (K) Retirement Savings Plan and Trust and on behalf of all other similarly situated Employee Benefit Plans, TYLER WAYNE SILLS, on behalf of the T-Mobile USA, Inc. 401 (K) Retirement Savings Plan and Trust and on behalf of all other similarly situated Employee Benefit Plans, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UFCW LOCAL 23 & GIANT EAGLE PENSION FUND and others
Wong v. FMR LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv10335
Defendant: National Financial Services LLC, FMR LLC, Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Andre W. Wong, Thomas Goodrich, Jason Bailis and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Tyler Wayne Sills, Cateenia D. Johnson and Regina Crystal Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Woodhouse, II v. US
as 15-1302
Plaintiff - Appellant: ENOCH WOODHOUSE, II
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES
WOODHOUSE et al v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff: AMY WOODHOUSE , RICHARD TOBEY SCOTT , WILLIAM HASTINGS and others
Defendant: MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES , MATTHEW DUNLAP and WALTER F MCKEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodhouse v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv12051
Plaintiff: Enoch Woodhouse, II
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?