Cases 11 - 20 of 244
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Maw v. Kearl
as 23-4103
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KERRY JASON MAW
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS KEARL, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
LARRY LEWIS, in his individual capacity
Burnham v. The United States, et al
as 23-1233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES, JEFFREY P. COLWELL, GORDON P. GALLAGHER and others
Lynn v. Willnauer, et al
as 23-3111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLIE WILLNAUER, MARY YOAKUM, TONI SINCLAIR and others
Burnham v. The United States, et al
as 23-1159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES, JEFFREY P. COLWELL, GORDON P. GALLAGHER and others
Medina, et al v. McIff Allen, et al
as 23-4057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAWN HEPIKIYA MEDINA, JUSTIN HORTON, MADELAINE THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HONORABLE ANNE MARIE MCIFF ALLEN, THE HONORABLE JEREMIAH HUMES, THE HONORABLE CHRISTINE JOHNSON and others
Pazos v. Tungston Heavy Powder, Inc., et al
as 23-8030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGE PAZOS
Defendant / Appellant:
TUNGSTON HEAVY POWDER, INC., DBA Tungsten Heavy Powder and Parts, Inc., TUNGSTEN PARTS WYOMING, INC., RUSSELL LEWIS and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH SEROV, AKA Joseph Sery
Neal v. Lovett, et al
as 23-1033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENARD DARNELL NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
LOVETT, Warden, M. STARR, Wardeh, DEANTON, Associate Warden and others
Zimmer v. Babcock
as 22-1362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK M. ZIMMER
Defendant / Appellee:
LEWIS T. BABCOCK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
