Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
United States v. Withrow
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BENNIE FRANK WITHROW, IV, AKA Lazy Wood
Bryant v. McLean, et al
as 24-1123
Plaintiff:
JAMUS ORAN BRYANT
Defendant:
BONNIE HEATHER MCLEAN, in her official and individual capacities, CHRISTINA APOSTOLI, in her official and individual capacities, FRANK ANTHONY MOSCHETTI, in his official and individual capacities and others
Franke v. Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration, et al
as 23-1376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARRID FRANKE
Defendant / Appellee:
FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN, NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN BENEFITS ADMINISTRATOR and NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN COMMITTEE
Franke v. Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration, et al
as 23-1362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JARRID FRANKE
Defendant / Appellant:
FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN, NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN BENEFITS ADMINISTRATOR and NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN COMMITTEE
Horton v. Tayloe, et al
as 23-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD EMMITT TAYLOE, MICHAEL CHARLES FLANAGAN, GERLAD FRANK NEUWIRTH and others
Cohen v. Roth Law, et al
as 23-1287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMILY COHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROTH LAW, LLC, FRANK & SALAHUDDIN LLC, DBA People's Law Firm, DBA Frank Law Office, LLC, MELISSA ROTH and others
Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust v. Montero
as 23-5045
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TULSA AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS TRUST
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK R. MONTERO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
