Cases 11 - 20 of 3,728
Mendez v. The New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Mario A Mendez
Defendant:
The New Mexico Corrections Department, Geo Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernandez (PS) v. ICE/DHS et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Petitioner:
Javier Balbuena Fernandez
Respondent:
ICE/DHS, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blackburn (PS) v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Roger Scott Blackburn
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, John Chapdelaine and Smithgal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Allen Ricks
Defendant:
Laura Kelly and Kris Kobach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heavener v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
John E Heavener and John E. Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merryfield v. Fleet, et al
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN J. MERRYFIELD
Defendant:
KELSEY FLEET, XAN BOWERSOX, PAM MIDDLETON and others
Williams v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
John K Williams
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa (PS) v. Habib
as 1:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
John M Rosa
Defendant:
Habib
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa (PS) v. Sam et al
as 1:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
John M Rosa and John Michael Rosa
Defendant:
Sam, Mckayla, Shawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amphly v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Amphly
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
