Cases 21 - 30 of 229
Walton v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Patrick Walton
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Shaun Hora, Gerald Geasmick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Missbach v. Utah State Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Oliver Missbach
Defendant:
Utah State Hospital, Dr. Kevin Holmes and Kevin Holmes
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Boger
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
David Matthew Palmer
Defendant:
Dr Michael Boger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noe v. United States Government, et al
as 23-1025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GEORGE NOE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, BERKLEY, Dr., H. SCHOUWEILER and others
Sheldon v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Petitioner:
Gary Sheldon
Respondent:
Dr. Williams and Herbst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ritchie v. Dr-K
as 1:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Larry Ritchie
Defendant:
Dr-K
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagen v. Girdner et al
as 6:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles David Hagen
Defendant:
TJ Girdner, Johnny Dallis, Mary Burlison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Basa v. Iba et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nakatsukasa Basa
Defendant:
Carmen Iba, Leneay Cabrera, John Aguon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Harrigan, et al
as 22-1444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANUEL GARCIA
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER T. HARRIGAN, DR., MS. C. LINDGREN, HSA, JOHN MCGAUGH, MAT and others
Desmond v. Weiser et al
as 1:2022cv03021
Petitioner:
Gareth Desmond
Defendant:
Dr. Williams
Respondent:
Weiser and Ensley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
