Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 252
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00261
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00262
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner: Alexander Dewitt Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Martinez v. Farris
as 23-6001
Petitioner / Appellant: MICA ALEXANDER MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee: JIM FARRIS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Cahoon v. Alexander We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv03294
Plaintiff: Quentin Robert Cahoon
Defendant: Tammy Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harley v. Alexander We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv03293
Plaintiff: Paeden Harley
Defendant: Tammy Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasquez v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00866
Petitioner: Alexander Anthony Velasquez
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia v. Reigenborn et al
as 1:2022cv02896
Plaintiff: Alexander Noel Garcia
Defendant: Richard A. Reigenborn, Kenny Sherman, Wilfred Europe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2022cv00497
Petitioner: Chelcie Alexander and Chelcie Cheyenne Keigh Alexander
Respondent: State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wilson v. Alexander We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv03289
Plaintiff: Casey Zachary Wilson and Cayson Zachary Wilson
Defendant: Tammy Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?