Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-6187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mochama v. Butler County et al
as 2:2014cv02121
Plaintiff:
Justine Osoro Mochama
Defendant:
Butler County, Kansas , Butler County Sheriff , Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
duBois, et al v. Payne County Bd County Comm'rs, et al
as 13-6144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RON DUBOIS and THORA DUBOIS, Husband and Wife, and as Co-Special Administrators of the Estate of Peter duBois, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
PAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, State of Oklahoma, R. B. HAUF, Sheriff of Payne County, State of Oklahoma, in his individual and official capacities and REESE LANE, Payne County Jail Administrator, in his individual and official capacities; JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5 as unknown Deputy Sheriffs/Employees of the Payne County Sheriffs Department, in their official and individual capacities
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00108
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
duBois et al v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Ron duBois and Thora duBois
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc , Payne County Board of County Commissioners , R B Hauf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. v. Stevens et al
as 6:2011cv00424
Plaintiff:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant:
Cecilene Stevens and C&F Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Spottedcorn v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01096
Plaintiff:
Paul Spottedcorn
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc, Canadian County Board of County Commissioners, Randall Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
