Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01015
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Malmstrom v. State of Utah Department of Children and Families et al
as 1:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Parker Malmstrom and Crystal Malmstrom
Defendant:
State of Utah Department of Children and Families , William Nebeker , Thomas Wade Malmstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Advertising Production Resources Company v. Ruskin et al
as 1:2016cv02322
Plaintiff:
Advertising Production Resources Company
Defendant:
Andrea Ruskin, T. Alex Blum and Blum Consulting Partners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1831
Cornuke v. Blum et al
as 1:2016cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Cornuke
Defendant:
Howard R. Blum, Hardscrabble Entertainment, Inc. and Castle Rock Entertainment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blum v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 6:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tyler Blum
Defendant:
Tahlequah, City of, Skylar Green and Pamela Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blum, et al v. CIR
as 12-9005
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT A. BLUM and AUDREY R. BLUM
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Blum v. Clements et al
as 1:2011cv02257
Plaintiff:
James F. Blum
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Travis (I) Trani, Travis Trani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Copper King Mining et al
as 2:2011cv00526
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Copper King Mining, Mark D. Dotson, Alexander Lindale and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Blum v. Katims et al
as 1:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Ari Blum
Defendant:
Jefferson J. Katims and Neurotron, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Neurotron, Inc. and Jefferson J. Katims
Counter_defendant:
Ari Blum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
