Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Carroll v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2019cv02132
Defendant:
Cody Jann, Devin C. Bateman, Therese (I) S. McCans and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tschetter v. Rotor Leasing, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01837
Plaintiff:
Kim Tschetter
Defendant:
Brian Clements, Rotor Leasing, Inc and Christopher Bateman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bateman et al v. Alpine Management and Consulting et al
as 1:2018cv00094
Defendant:
Brent A. Felix, Alpine Management and Consulting LLC, Alpine Management and Consulting and others
Plaintiff:
Max Bateman and Connie Bateman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramsey et al v. Southwest Correctional Medical Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01845
Defendant:
Jim Tsurapas, Linda (I) Gan, Linda Gan and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ramsey and Karla Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bateman v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2018cv02049
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Bateman
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bateman v. Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02921
Plaintiff:
Marisa Bateman
Defendant:
Health Insurance Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEC Unlimited et al v. Send Out Cards et al
as 2:2016mc00935
Petitioner:
DEC Unlimited and DEC Partners
Respondent:
Send Out Cards , Erik Bateman and Erik Laver
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Bateman v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00338
Plaintiff:
Misty Bateman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cinemapub v. Petilos et al
as 2:2016cv00318
Defendant:
Petilos, John T. Nielsen, Salvador D. Petilos and others
Plaintiff:
Cinemapub and Cinemapub LLC doing business as Brewvies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
