Cases 11 - 20 of 1,303
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Edward v. McIntosh County, et al.
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward, Jr.
Defendant:
McIntosh County, et al.,, Kevin Ledbetter, Monica Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Vanbaelinghem et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Beat Vanbaelinghem, Farzana Vanbaelinghem and Beat Frank Vanbaelinghem
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. and American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gregor (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, C.D.O.C Administrative Offcials, Moses Stancil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 1:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Niccum et al
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Darnell Washington
Defendant:
Andrew Niccum, Christopher Cochran, Jacob Vaporis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Frank M Reynolds
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
