Cases 11 - 20 of 267
Randolph v. Finney County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Randolph
Defendant:
Finney County Jail, Kyle Lawson and (fnu) Romel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urrutia v. Welch et al
as 5:2023cv03010
Plaintiff:
Oscar David Urrutia
Defendant:
Mark Welch, Mike Warren, Casey Zeigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lawson v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00762
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Charles Leonard Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wright v. City of Ponca City, et al
as 22-6137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEASA MARIE WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PONCA CITY, KELLI KINCAID, KATELYNN LAWSON and others
Bridges, II v. Louthan et al
as 6:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant:
David Louthan, Mike Elkins, Eric Fritcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant:
Kevin Gates, White Boy, Billy Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lawson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Mathew Lawson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
