Cases 11 - 20 of 228
Route App v. Heuberger et al
as 2:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Route App
Defendant:
Mac Heuberger, ElevatiONE, Navidium App and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Travis Robinson and Brad Pearson
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. et al v. Solis
as 1:2021cv02131
Plaintiff:
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc and NCS Pearson, Inc doing business as Pearson VUE
Defendant:
Dailys Solis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
First v. Hockett, et al
as 23-5032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAN MARIE FIRST
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN HOCKETT, JOHN PEARSON and CITY OF SALINA, OKLAHOMA
Donald v. Pearson et al
as 1:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
LaRon Antonio Donald
Defendant:
Doug Pearson, Mark Fairbairn, Linsday Gouty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Pacheco et al
as 0:2022cv00026
Petitioner:
James E Pearson
Respondent:
Michael Pacheco, Wyoming Attorney General and Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ullerich v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2021cv02954
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Ullerich
Defendant:
Jefferson County, City of Aurora, City of Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Clervrain et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John M. O'Connor, Paul B. Hunker, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
