Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Session v. Carson et al
as 1:2018cv00239
Plaintiff:
Franky L. Session
Defendant:
Vanessa Carson, Lindsey E. Fish, Teddy L. Laurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Shoe et al
as 1:2017cv03038
Plaintiff:
Wesley R. Brown
Defendant:
Becky Shoe and Harlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Lipocine Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Lewis, Lipocine Investor Group and Anthony Morassi
Defendant:
Lipocine Inc. , Mahesh V. Patel and Morgan R. Brown
Movant:
Grey Burleson and John Redmond
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Brown et al
as 2:2015cv09185
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Beverly A. Brown, Wesley R. Brown and Community America Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Jacobsen Construction Company v. SRB International et al
as 2:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Jacobsen Construction Company
Defendant:
SRB International and Sasha R. Brown
Counter_claimant:
Sasha R. Brown and SRB International
Counter_defendant:
Jacobsen Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Seufert, et al
as 1:2013cv01191
Plaintiff:
Wesley R. Brown
Defendant:
T. Marshal Seufert, A. Bruce Jones and Shannon M. O'connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
Firena R Brown
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brown v. Roberts, et al
as 11-3085
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID R. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and STEPHEN N. SIX, Attorney General of Kansas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
