Cases 11 - 20 of 494
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds et al v. Dittrich et al
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Wade Dittrich and Tristan Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
David v. Wasatch County, UT et al
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Lynn David
Defendant:
Wasatch County, UT, Mark Nelson, Spencer Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Wade v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1101
Petitioner:
CHARLES FREDERICK WADE
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
XL Insurance America, Inc. v. Pemberton
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
XL Insurance America, Inc.
Defendant:
Randy Wade Pemberton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Burnett v. Heaton et al
as 5:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Jason Wade Burnett
Respondent:
Ted Heaton, Paul Kitzke and Clint Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wade v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Danny Wade
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Eddy
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Wade Murphy
Defendant:
John Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ceola v. Godin
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Wade Ceola
Defendant:
Jonathan Godin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
