Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 820
Su v. Ascent Construction, et al
as 24-4025
Plaintiff: JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant: ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Utah corporation, BRADLEY L. KNOWLTON, an individual, ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, an employee benefit plan and others
United States v. Burningham
as 24-4023
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID BRADLEY BURNINGHAM
Brave Law Firm v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, et al
as 24-3028
Plaintiff: BRAVE LAW FIRM, LLC
Defendant: TRUCK ACCIDENT LAWYERS GROUP, INC., BRAD PISTOTNIK LAW, P. A. and BRADLEY A. PISTOTNIK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bradley v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff: Kimberly Bradley
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vivint Inc et al v. Sunrun Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff: Vivint Inc, Vivant Smart Home Inc. and Smart Home Pros Inc.
Defendant: Sunrun Inc, Bradley Rossiter, Zackary Andersen and others
In re: Bates
as 24-2005
Petitioner: BRADLEY BATES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03286
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Churchill v. Clark
as 6:2023cv00412
Plaintiff: Zechariah Michael Gilbert Chruchill and Zechariah Michael Gilbert Churchill
Defendant: Bradley Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boersma v. Otte et al
as 2:2023cv00221
Defendant: Wheatland Police Department Officer, Bradley G Otte, Platte County and others
Plaintiff: Casey Joe Boersma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?