Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Jameson v. Samuel
as 13-6237
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEON JAMESON
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director
Burgess v. Daniels, et al
as 13-1397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY BURGESS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, PAUL M. LAIRD, CHARLES E. SAMUELS and others
Burgess v. Daniels et al
as 1:2013cv02191
Plaintiff:
Corey Burgess
Defendant:
Charles A. Daniels, Charles (I) A. Daniels, Charles E. Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Samuels
as 5:2013cv00660
Petitioner:
Tyron Nunn
Respondent:
Charles E Samuels, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Leffebre v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv01602
Plaintiff:
Andre David Leffebre
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Charles E. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marshall v. Osagie et al
as 1:2013cv01607
Plaintiff:
La'Ron Marshall
Defendant:
Anthony Osagie, R. Camacho, C. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine v. Laird et al
as 5:2013cv03101
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Paul Laird, Amber Nelson, Gordon Harpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gaines v. Samuels
as 5:2013cv03019
Petitioner:
Calvin Bernis Gaines
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Leffebre v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2013cv00222
Petitioner:
Andre Leffebre
Respondent:
David Berkebile and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bacote et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv01570
Plaintiff:
Michael Bacote , Harold Cunningham , John W Narducci, Jr and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Newton E. Kendig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
