Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Harvey v. Lisac et al
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J. Harvey, III
Defendant:
Lisac, Thompson, Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (ID 06598) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03247
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Reno, County of, Derek Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance v. Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jaelea Chance
Defendant:
Farmers Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Archer v. Cook et al
as 1:2021cv02649
Plaintiff:
Celeste T. Archer
Defendant:
John Kroll, Sue Sharkey, Nolbert Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance et al v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Robert D Chance and Anne M Chance
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brauning v. Christian et al
as 6:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
John Gilbert Christian, Charles Steven Kessinger, Lori Lynn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maes v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 1:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
Michael Maes
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Mark Bowen, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2021cv02136
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Plaintiff:
Chance Montana Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Smith v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 2:2021cv00167
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Henry J Chance, Mark Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Dominick Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Williams, et al
as 21-1058
Defendant / Appellee:
CASADY, CHAD, KILPOLITES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
