Cases 21 - 30 of 406
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Quick
as 23-7085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIE QUICK, Warden at O.S.P.
Davis, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLA DAVIS and JALEN DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, in his official and individual capacities, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Bailey v. Beale, et al
as 23-7083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTY BAILEY, as Personal Respresentative of the Estate of Jeffrey Peterson, deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS BEALE, Officer
Defendant:
CITY OF ADA, JUSSELY CANADA, Officer, MICHAEL MEEKS, Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vitt v. Blanton
as 1:2023cv02754
Plaintiff:
Albert W. Vitt
Defendant:
Christie Blanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Advance Research Chemicals, Inc. et al v. Gasoliq Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Advance Research Chemicals, Inc. and Inhance Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Gasoliq Solutions, LLC, Parimal Christie, Navin Mathur and others
Rich v. Baird et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Stephens County, Dexter Lawley, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lay v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Wade Lay
Respondent:
Christie Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
