Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Gunn v. Gordon et al
as 2:2013cv00659
Plaintiff:
Richard Q. Gunn
Defendant:
Dennis Gordon, Richard Garden and Alfred Bigelow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunn v. BAC Home Loans Servicing et al
as 2:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
Travis Gunn
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing , Recontrust Company NA and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Salt Lake Community College et al
as 2:2011cv00231
Plaintiff:
Aaron Johnson
Defendant:
Salt Lake Community College , Karen Gunn, Chris Picard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. Khicha et al
as 5:2010cv03218
Plaintiff:
Robert Rock Gunn
Defendant:
Sanjay Khicha, Donald Vine and St. Francis Via Christie Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2010cv03213
Plaintiff:
Robert Rock Gunn
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Gary Steed, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey et al v. Gunn et al
as 1:2010cv02203
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Hickey and Forty-Five Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
David J. Gunn and 38th Bomb Group Association (WWII), The
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Gunn v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv00980
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Gunn
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and J. W. Wands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easter v. Jones et al
as 6:2010cv00013
Plaintiff:
Nick Easter
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Justin Jones, Stormy Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Jones, III
as 09-5107
Petitioner:
MORRIS RICHARD JONES, III, AKA Pete Gunn, AKA Petey Gunn
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Monitronics Funding v. Akaki et al
as 2:2009cv00550
Plaintiff:
Monitronics Funding and Monitronics Funding
Defendant:
Krislen Akaki, Nate Barney, Mike Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
