Cases 21 - 30 of 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Young v. Shipman et al
as 2:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Guy Young
Defendant:
M Shipman, FNU Brown and Gary Maciel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bryan v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Guy Bryan
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Chad Miller, Kathleen Lamphere and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith v. Owens et al
as 4:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
Michael Guy Smith
Respondent:
Scott Owens and Lieutenant Pendergraft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Domai v. Wooldridge
as 21-4139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUY M. DOMAI
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN B. WOOLDRIDGE
Clark et al v. Haaland et al
as 1:2021cv01091
Plaintiff:
Guy Clark, Linda Corwin, Craig Corwin and others
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Camille C Touton, Martha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Agwu et al v. City and County of Denver, The, et al
as 1:2021cv02478
Plaintiff:
REBECCA AGWU, JESSE ANDERSEN, AZRIA ARROYO and others
Defendant:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, REECE HUNTER, ALFONSO CARRERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Rose v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01740
Plaintiff:
Guy O. Rose
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Yousuf et al v. Longfeng Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Xu Gui Qing, Guowu Li and Longfeng Corporation doing business as New XO Market
Plaintiff:
MD. Rokonnurzzaman and Abu Yousuf
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Glover v. Oklahoma County of et al
as 5:2021cv00294
Defendant:
KOCO TV Channel 5 News, David Prater, Oklahoma County of and others
Plaintiff:
Natraun Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
