Cases 31 - 40 of 168
Castaneda v. State of CA, et al
as 21-2134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE CASTANEDA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CA, C.O.L.A., CITY OF L.A. and others
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flaherty v. Office of Juvenile Affairs et al
as 5:2021cv00871
Plaintiff:
Jamie Flaherty
Defendant:
Office of Juvenile Affairs, Danny Hall, Thomas Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Acosta v. United States Department of Social Security, The
as 1:2021cv01240
Defendant:
United States Department of Social Security, The
Plaintiff:
Theodore Dean Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Weiser et al
as 1:2021cv00630
Plaintiff:
Theodore Dean Acosta
Defendant:
Gurley, Tina Fang, Nathan Coats and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson (ID 117934) v. Johnson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2020cv03211
Defendant:
Leawood, Kansas, City of, Johnson County Sheriff's Department, Wyandotte County Unified Government and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Shamillyon Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Accord OKC Members LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00641
Plaintiff:
Jose Acosta
Defendant:
Accord OKC Members LLC, Isola Bella Extended Stay and Accord OKC Members LLC doing business as Isola Bella Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cruz Acosta, et al v. Barr
as 20-9566
Petitioner:
VERONICA CRUZ and ELIAS CRUZ ACOSTA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
