Cases 31 - 40 of 246
Mackey et al v. Watkins et al
as 6:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Robert Mackey and Christina Sund
Defendant:
Charles Watkins and FedEx
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Howell et al v. Watkins
as 1:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Lisa Howell and Chris Howell
Defendant:
Harry Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Watkins v. Denver County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv02858
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamont Watkins
Defendant:
Denver County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Nunn
as 4:2021cv00463
Petitioner:
Daniel Cody Watkins
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Henderson et al v. MidFirst Bank et al
as 6:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
Kenneth K. Henderson, Kevin E. Henderson, Monica J. Henderson and others
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank, James P. Walker, Walker Resources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watkins v. Los Angeles County, et al
as 21-8063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARYANN WATKINS, trustee of Madeleine Watkins and Marc Watkins Irrevocable Living Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA, KATHRYN BARGER, individually and in her official capacity as Los Angeles County Fifth District Supervisor, RODRIGO CASTRO-SILVA, individually and in his official capacity as Los Angeles County California Counsel and others
Arndt v. Peery et al
as 5:2021cv00584
Defendant:
Peggy Kates, Lisa Epperson, Gessica Sewell and others
Plaintiff:
David Arndt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Genesh
as 21-3077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENYA WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
GENESH, INC., DBA Burger King
Lopez v. Ludvik Electric Company et al
as 1:2021cv01023
Defendant:
Ludvik Electric Company and Robert Watkins
Plaintiff:
THERESA LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
