Cases 31 - 40 of 189
Castaneda v. Great Bend Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv03139
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ray Castaneda
Defendant:
Great Bend Police Department, Barton County Sheriff's Department, Shane Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Rogers, et al
as 21-3232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FAHEEM BOWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL ROGERS, ROEMICH, SPELLMAN and others
Barton v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2021cv00480
Plaintiff:
Jordan S Barton
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Park City Performances et al
as 2:2021cv00627
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
Park City Performances a Utah Corporation doing business as Egyptian Theatre, Randy Barton, Utopia Artists and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
In re: Barton
as 21-5076
Petitioner:
JORDAN SCOTT BARTON
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL J. HUNTER, Oklahoma Attorney General
Williams v. Denwalt et al
as 1:2021cv02595
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamont Williams
Defendant:
Simon Denwalt, Simon (I) Denwalt, Austin Chrestensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. CoreCivic Facility Support Center et al
as 5:2021cv03166
Plaintiff:
Tony B. Thomas
Defendant:
CoreCivic Facility Support Center, (fnu) Necho, (fnu) Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barton et al v. Markel American Insurance Company et al
as 6:2021cv00132
Defendant:
John Benefield and Markel American Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Hazel Barton and Bill Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
