Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Malone v. Crow
as 4:2020cv00227
Petitioner:
Gregory Kyle Malone
Defendant:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Malone
as 20-1183
Defendant / Appellant:
COLT FRANCIS MALONE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richter v. Nelson et al
as 4:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Denise Armstrong, Lesli Blazer, Cynthia Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan D Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Troo Clean Enviromental LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00211
Defendant:
Roy Malone, Tyler David, Orin David and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Martin Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Briggs-Hall et al v. Berkeley County Department of Social Services Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00610
Defendant:
South Carolina, Inc., Berkeley County Department of Social Services Inc., Salita Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Jamaica Malone, Tracey Briggs-Hall, Joseph Malone, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. Pilshaw, et al
as 20-3007
Defendant / Appellee:
G. GORDON ATCHESON, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, HENRY W. GREEN, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, (FNU) LEWIS, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Malone et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03579
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Malone and Michael Thomas Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tibbetts v. Malone et al
as 1:2019cv02899
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc. and Bryan Malone
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tibbetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Loggins
as 19-3182
Respondent:
STEPHEN D. HILL, Judge, Kansas Court of Appeals, DAVID M. UNRUH, Sedgwick County Commissioner, JEFF EASTER, Sedgwick County Sheriff and others
Petitioner:
KEVIN D. LOGGINS, SR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
