Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Copeland et al v. C.A.A.I.R. et al
as 4:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Arthur Copeland , Brandon Spurgin , Brad McGahey and others
Defendant:
C.A.A.I.R., Simmons Foods, Inc., Simmons Pet Food, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Copeland v. Lawrence et al
as 5:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dwain Copeland
Defendant:
Anne Lawrence , Carla D Haddard, Mary B Stanley Renouf and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Copeland v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dwain Copeland
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services and Texas Attorney General Child Support Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VFS US LLC et al v. Copeland Services Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
VFS US LLC and VFS Leasing Co
Defendant:
Copeland Services Inc , Copeland Hot Oil Service LLC , Jane D Robison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beals v. Weygand et al
as 5:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Beals
Defendant:
Sammy Weygand, Marc Daniels, Tanner Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00575
Plaintiff:
Lillian M. Copeland
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Copeland v. County of Chautauqua, et al
as 16-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY G. COPELAND, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CHAUTAUQUA, ROGER GOSSARD, District Court Judge, Montgomery County District Court, LARRY MARKLE, Montgomery County Attorney and others
Copeland v. Sanofi SA et al
as 5:2016cv01226
Plaintiff:
Donna Copeland
Defendant:
Sanofi SA, Aventis Pharma SA, Sanofi US Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ali v. Alire et al
as 1:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
Eman Ali
Defendant:
Alire, Tel, Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. USA
as 4:2016cv00490
Petitioner:
Aaron Eugene Copeland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
